Wednesday, August 11, 2021

Judicial Ethics Opinion 21-65 | New York Law Journal

The Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics responds to written inquiries from New York state’s approximately 3,600 judges and justices, as well as hundreds of judicial hearing officers, support magistrates, court attorney-referees, and judicial candidates (both judges and non-judges seeking election to judicial office). The committee interprets the Rules Governing Judicial Conduct (22 NYCRR Part 100) and, to the extent applicable, the Code of Judicial Conduct. The committee consists of 27 current and retired judges, and is co-chaired by the Honorable Margaret Walsh, a justice of the supreme court, and the Honorable Lillian Wan, a court of claims judge and acting supreme court justice.

Digest: A judge may not accept a social media company’s invitation to address its employees in-house about how legal process is authorized, the use and purpose of the company’s records in legal proceedings, and the importance of accuracy and vigilance in response to legal process.


Source link

The post Judicial Ethics Opinion 21-65 | New York Law Journal first appeared on Aggressive Injury Law.



from
https://www.aggressiveinjurylaw.com/judicial-ethics-opinion-21-65-new-york-law-journal/

No comments:

Post a Comment

Seed for Texas abortion ban was planted 20 years ago, in Louisiana

Twenty years ago, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals took up a case over a Louisiana abortion law that might sound familiar: it empowered ci...